Yellen, caught between financial markets and US Congress, pleases neither
By Heather Timmons and David Lawder
WASHINGTON, March 23 (Reuters) -Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will sit for her third congressional hearing in a week on Thursday, where, once again, she's likely to be pressed on whether the U.S. government will guarantee all of the country's $19.2 trillion in bank deposits.
It's something that the Treasury and regulators did in the depths of the 2008 global financial crisis, but regulatory reforms in 2010 required a streamlined approval from Congress.
After a swift governmentpledge to guarantee uninsured deposits in failed Silicon Valley Bank SIVB.O and Signature Bank SBNY.O when they were deemed to threaten widespread bank runs this month, bankers and market players have been obsessed with the question of whether all U.S. bank deposits are now effectively backstopped by Washington.
Bankers have argued that a universal guarantee is needed to keep deposits from fleeing for perceived safety to large banks that are viewed as "too big to fail" until the current banking crisis eases.
Yellen is the face of the U.S. government on the issue, and her public comments have pushed markets on a roller coaster ride, with seemingly conflicting answers.
Meanwhile, hardline Republicans oppose any increase in the current $250,000 Federal Deposit Insurance Corp insurance limit.
Without authorization from Congress, much of what Yellen can do to calm markets and safeguard deposits mimics the contours of the actions on SVB and Signature Bank - case-by-case assessments of whether a bank failure would cause spillovers.
Yellen explained to the U.S. Senate on March 16 that there would be no guarantee for deposits in banks not deemed a systemic threat, spooking community banks. But her remarks at a bank conference on Tuesday that similar actions to the SVB guarantee "could be warranted if smaller institutions suffer deposit runs," cheered them.
On Wednesday, Republican Senator Bill Hagerty asked Yellen about reports that U.S. officials considered options to safeguard deposits without the approval of Congress and asked: "Madam Secretary, does ensuring every deposit at every FDIC insured bank in the nation over $250,000 require congressional approval?"
Yellen said she was not considering such a move and was reviewing banking risks on a case-by-case basis, adding: "I have not considered or discussed anything having to do with blanket insurance or guarantees of deposits."
The remarks, coming after the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by one quarter of a percentage point, contributed to another fall in the shares of struggling First Republic Bank FRC.N, analysts said.
MARKET VERSUS POLITICAL REALITIES
The comments drew quick criticism from investors, including Bill Ackman, who has relentlessly warned of dire consequences to small U.S. banks if the government doesn't cough up a bigger guarantee, was quick to criticize Yellen.
"I would be surprised if deposit outflows don't accelerate effective immediately. A temporary systemwide deposit guarantee is needed to stop the bleeding," Ackman said on Twitter after Yellen's testimony to a Senate committee on Wednesday.
But those market demands fail to take into account the political reality that the Biden administration faces, regulatory experts say.
"This can't be done by executive order," said Andrew Levin, a Dartmouth College economics professor and former Fed official. He added that going through Congress is "politically infeasible."
Setting aside Congress's authority, the issue is a non-starter in most U.S. government offices, sources say. The idea was mentioned in an official brainstorming session after SVB's March 10 collapse, but sources told Reuters it was never under serious consideration.
Yellen is due to testify later on Thursday before the U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government.
Reporting by Heather Timmons and David Lawder; Writing by Heather Timmons; Editing by Paul Simao
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
