Biden’s antitrust playbook values shots on goal
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Ben Winck
WASHINGTON, Jan 25 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Joe Biden is reaching deep into history to sustain his attack on perceived anticompetitive behavior. In addition to targeting a 15-year-old Google deal, the U.S. president’s trustbusters are dusting off an arcane law to probe potential price discrimination. The broader strategy will keep big companies on their toes.
The latest Federal Trade Commission investigation hinges on the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act, which bars suppliers from offering large chains discounts at the expense of smaller peers. It was designed to crack down on the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, which dominated the grocery industry at the time. Coca-Cola KO.N and PepsiCo PEP.O are today’s guinea pigs, according to a Politico report. A statement from the agency suggests the pharmaceutical industry could be next.
Reviving Robinson-Patman is part of a larger effort by the White House to curb perceived harm from consolidation. Biden signed an executive order to ramp up antitrust inquiries, citing excessive merger activity for lifting prices. The FTC’s newest commissioner, Alvaro Bedoya, also invoked the price discrimination law, which hasn’t been used since a settlement with spice-maker McCormick MKC.N in 2000, during a speech.
A 2018 study found that three-quarters of U.S. industries have grown increasingly consolidated over the last two decades, helping boost profit margins, but recent events also theoretically bolster the case. In the third quarter, Coca-Cola raised prices by 12% compared to 3% broadly for nonalcoholic beverages, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pepsi jacked up its drink and snack prices by 17%, far higher than the national average. The companies cited higher costs, but their bottom lines grew by even more than what they were charging customers.
This aggressive antitrust approach has produced only mixed results, however. The government successfully blocked the merger of book publishers Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster, but also has lost three times in court, leaving UnitedHealth UNH.N, Booz Allen Hamilton BAH.N and Illumina ILMN.O to proceed with their challenged transactions.
The administration keeps trying different angles. A bold effort to block the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal is pending. The Justice Department sued Alphabet’s Google on Tuesday, arguing that the search giant abused its market dominance in advertising following acquisitions in the 2010s. There was a time when competition authorities preferred a clearer path to score against what it considered monopolistic behavior. Biden’s playbook values taking as many shots as possible.
Follow @BenWinck on Twitter
CONTEXT NEWS
The U.S. Justice Department on Jan. 24 filed a lawsuit against Alphabet-owned Google alleging the search giant abused its dominance in digital advertising. In the complaint, regulators argue that Google used “anticompetitive, exclusionary, and unlawful means to eliminate or severely diminish any threat to its dominance over digital advertising technologies.”
Separately, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, under the Robinson-Patman Act, is investigating Coca-Cola and PepsiCo over potential soft-drink price discrimination, Politico reported on Jan. 18, citing unnamed sources.
Referencing the rarely used 1936 law, Alvaro Bedoya, who joined the agency as a commissioner in May, said in a speech on Sept. 22 that the FTC should focus on fairness in antitrust enforcement.
U.S. President Joe Biden enacted an executive order on “promoting competition in the American economy” on July 9, 2021, tasking the FTC with reviewing potential violations of the Robinson-Patman Act, among other antitrust rules.
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Amanda Gomez
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
