Rusal plans further lawsuit against Potanin over Nornickel pact
Updates with Interros, Rusal comment
By Sam Tobin and Clara Denina
LONDON, March 23 (Reuters) -Aluminium giant Rusal RUAL.MM plans to bring a further lawsuit in London against Vladimir Potanin, CEO of Nornickel GMKN.MM, court documents show, marking the latest flare-up in relations between two of Russia's biggest metal companies.
Rusal wishes to "bring certain further claims" against Potanin and his affiliate Whiteleave Holdings Ltd that are not covered by a lawsuit filed in London's High Court on Oct. 21, according to a court order dated March 21 and seen by Reuters.
Rusal declined to comment, but previously said its legal action was to protect the interests of Nornickel's shareholders. Potanin holds a 37% stake, while Rusal holds 26%.
"Lawyers on the case are waiting for their licence as they are preparing to litigate," Potanin's Interros holding company said in an emailed statement.
Rusal's lawsuit has been paused until mid-July pending an application by Potanin and Whiteleave's lawyers Seladore Legal to Britain's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation for a licence to represent them, the court order states.
Nornickel has not been directly targeted by Western sanctions, but Britain and the U.S. have placed sanctions on Potanin.
The dispute that led to the October lawsuit, and Rusal's planned further claims, centres on an agreement brokered by Moscow in 2012 between Nornickel's two largest shareholders, Potanin and Rusal, which protected Nornickel's dividend payouts.
Oleg Deripaska, founder of Rusal, is not a party to the litigation.
Disagreements over dividends have been the main reason for on-and-off rows between shareholders at Nornickel and Rusal. One of the parties to the 2012 deal is billionaire Roman Abramovich, who helped to cool the dispute a decade ago.
The deal, which was due to expire at the end of 2022, resolved a disagreement over how much profit should be returned to investors and how much should be invested in Nornickel.
Rusal alleges Potanin and Whiteleave procured the transfer of "crucial subsidiaries" out of Nornickel's corporate group "with the sole or main purpose of diverting value away from the (Nornickel) Group, as part of a wider strategy of entrenching (Whiteleave and Potanin's) control", according to a summary of the lawsuit dated Oct. 21.
Reporting by Sam Tobin and Clara Denina, additional reporting by Anastasia Lyrchikova; editing by Barbara Lewis
์ต์ ๋ด์ค
๋ฉด์ฑ ์กฐํญ: XM Group ํ์ฌ๋ ์ฒด๊ฒฐ ์ ์ฉ ์๋น์ค์ ์จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ฑฐ๋ ํ๋ซํผ์ ๋ํ ์ ๊ทผ์ ์ ๊ณตํ์ฌ, ๊ฐ์ธ์ด ์น์ฌ์ดํธ์์ ๋๋ ์น์ฌ์ดํธ๋ฅผ ํตํด ์ด์ฉ ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ฑฐ๋ ์ฌ์ฉํ ์ ์๋๋ก ํ์ฉํฉ๋๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ํด ๋ณ๊ฒฝํ๊ฑฐ๋ ํ์ฅํ ์๋๋ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ์ ๊ทผ ๋ฐ ์ฌ์ฉ์๋ ๋ค์ ์ฌํญ์ด ํญ์ ์ ์ฉ๋ฉ๋๋ค: (i) ์ด์ฉ ์ฝ๊ด, (ii) ์ํ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ , (iii) ์์ ๋ฉด์ฑ ์กฐํญ. ๋ฐ๋ผ์, ์ด๋ฌํ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ ์ผ๋ฐ์ ์ธ ์ ๋ณด์ ๋ถ๊ณผํฉ๋๋ค. ํนํ, ์จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ฑฐ๋ ํ๋ซํผ์ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ ๊ธ์ต ์์ฅ์์์ ๊ฑฐ๋์ ๋ํ ๊ถ์ ๋ ์ ์์ด ์๋๋๋ค. ๊ธ์ต ์์ฅ์์์ ๊ฑฐ๋๋ ์๋ณธ์ ์๋นํ ์ํ์ ์๋ฐํฉ๋๋ค.
์จ๋ผ์ธ ๊ฑฐ๋ ํ๋ซํผ์ ๊ณต๊ฐ๋ ๋ชจ๋ ์๋ฃ๋ ๊ต์ก/์ ๋ณด ๋ชฉ์ ์ผ๋ก๋ง ์ ๊ณต๋๋ฉฐ, ๊ธ์ต, ํฌ์์ธ ๋๋ ๊ฑฐ๋ ์กฐ์ธ ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ณ , ๊ฑฐ๋ ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ ๊ธฐ๋ก, ๊ธ์ต ์ํ ๋๋ ์์น ์๋ ๊ธ์ต ํ๋ก๋ชจ์ ์ ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ ์ ๋๋ ๊ถ์ ๋ฅผ ํฌํจํ์ง ์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ํฌํจํด์๋ ์๋ฉ๋๋ค.
์ด ์น์ฌ์ดํธ์ ํฌํจ๋ ๋ชจ๋ ์๊ฒฌ, ๋ด์ค, ๋ฆฌ์์น, ๋ถ์, ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ, ๊ธฐํ ์ ๋ณด ๋๋ ์ 3์ ์ฌ์ดํธ์ ๋ํ ๋งํฌ์ ๊ฐ์ด XM์ด ์ค๋นํ๋ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ฟ๋ง ์๋๋ผ, ์ 3์ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ ์ผ๋ฐ ์์ฅ ๋ ผํ์ผ๋ก์ "ํ์ฌ" ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ์ ๊ณต๋๋ฉฐ, ํฌ์ ์กฐ์ธ์ผ๋ก ์ฌ๊ฒจ์ง์ง ์์ต๋๋ค. ๋ชจ๋ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๊ฐ ํฌ์ ๋ฆฌ์์น๋ก ํด์๋๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ, ํฌ์ ๋ฆฌ์์น์ ๋ ๋ฆฝ์ฑ์ ์ด์งํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ๊ณ ์๋ ๋ฒ์ ์๊ฑด์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๊ฐ ์๋๋์ง ์์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ์ค๋น๋์ง ์์๋ค๋ ์ ์ ์ธ์งํ๊ณ ๋์ํด์ผ ํฉ๋๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์, ๊ด๋ จ ๋ฒ๋ฅ ๋ฐ ๊ท์ ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ง์ผํ ์ปค๋ฎค๋์ผ์ด์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ฃผ๋ฉ๋๋ค. ์ฌ๊ธฐ์์ ์ ๊ทผํ ์ ์๋ ์์ ์ธ๊ธํ ์ ๋ณด์ ๋ํ ๋น๋ ๋ฆฝ ํฌ์ ๋ฆฌ์์น ๋ฐ ์ํ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์๋ฆผ์ ์ฝ๊ณ , ์ดํดํ์๊ธฐ ๋ฐ๋๋๋ค.
