XM은(는) 미국 국적의 시민에게 서비스를 제공하지 않습니다.

US Supreme Court rejects states' settlement over Rio Grande waters



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-US Supreme Court rejects states' settlement over Rio Grande waters</title></head><body>

Adds comment from New Mexico attorney general in paragraphs 9-11

By Nate Raymond

June 21 (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday rejected a settlement between three states resolving a more thandecade-long dispute over how to divvy up water from the Rio Grande River, finding it failed to account for the federal government's interests.

The court in a 5-4 ruling held that a consent decree that would allocate the Rio Grande's waters between Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado would wrongly if approved dispose of claims raised by the federal government without its consent.

The court had earlier in the litigation in 2018 allowed the federal government to intervene in the lawsuit, which was filed by Texas in 2013 againstthe other two states, to assert claims similar to Texas's that New Mexico was excessively pumping groundwater from the Rio Grande.

The settlement would have codified a method of determining how to allocate the Rio Grande's waters to each state. But the federal government objected, citing concerns about groundwater pumping by New Mexico that could interfere with an irrigation system run by the federal government.

Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in an opinion joined by the court's two other liberals and conservatives Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, said the federal government was still today advancing the same claims as it did in 2018.

Its interest were unique, she said, and like those of the states' arose out of the 1938 Rio Grande Compact, an agreement that apportions the river's waters among them.

To ensure Texas receives its share, the compact relies on the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to operate an irrigation system in New Mexico.

"Having acknowledged those interests, and having allowed the United States to intervene to assert them, we cannot now allow Texas and New Mexico to leave the United States up the river without a paddle," Jackson wrote.

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez, a Democrat, in a statement said he was disappointed by the ruling and the federal government's decision to stand in the way of a settlement of a case that neither Texas nor New Mexico wish to continue.

"This decision will result in millions more spent on legal fees and more uncertainty for New Mexico's water users, all because the Interior Department feels the need to dictate how New Mexico meets its obligations to the State of Texas," he said.

The U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment.

Texas hadtaken issue with the extent groundwater was being pumped from the river for farming along southern New Mexico. Drought and climate change have made the river's waters less plentiful in the decades since the 1938 compact.

Friday's decision rejected a recommendation to approve the settlement by U.S. Circuit Judge Michael Melloy, a member of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals assigned to serve as a special master in the dispute. The Supreme Court relies on such special masters for disputes between states, which it has original jurisdiction over.

Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by the court's remaining three conservatives, said the court should have followed Melloy's recommendation and accepted the settlement and allow the federal government to pursue its claims instead in the lower courts if it wanted.

Gorsuch said the decision "represents a serious assault on the power of States to govern, as they always have, the water rights of users in their jurisdictions."

"I fear the majority's shortsighted decision will only make it harder to secure the kind of cooperation between federal and state authorities reclamation law envisions and many river systems require," he wrote.

The case is Texas v. New Mexico, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 22O141.

For the United States: Frederick Liu of the U.S. Department of Justice

For Texas: Lanora Pettit of the Texas Office of the Attorney General

For New Mexico: Jeffrey J. Wechsler of Montgomery & Andrews



Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston

</body></html>

면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.

온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.

이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.

리스크 경고: 고객님의 자본이 위험에 노출 될 수 있습니다. 레버리지 상품은 모든 분들에게 적합하지 않을수 있습니다. 당사의 리스크 공시를 참고하시기 바랍니다.