Competitive dynamics in focus as US tries to stop Tapestry-Capri merger
Adds details from witness testimony in paragraphs 9, 10-14 and background on FTC cases in 4, 7
By Siddharth Cavale
NEW YORK, Sept 9 (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission urged a federal judge in New York to block Tapestry's TPR.N $8.5 billion merger with rival handbag maker Capri Holdings CPRI.N at a trial on Monday, arguing it will eliminate fierce head-to-head competition in the market for "accessible luxury."
The FTC argues the merger announced in August 2023 would eliminate head-to-head competition between Tapestry's Coach and Kate Spade brands and Capri's Michael Kors' brands, which has resulted in better prices, discounts and promotions for consumers and wages and workplace benefits for employees.
The deal would also give Tapestry a dominant share of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, controlling over 50% of it once the deal is completed, the FTC said. The regulator defined the "accessible luxury" market as handbags sold between $100 and below $1,000, which forms most of Coach and Kors' lines.
During the first day of trial, which was attended by Henry Liu, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, the antitrust regulator sought to use the companies' own internal emails against them, while the defense tried to poke holes in the way it defines the "accessible luxury" market.
Tapestry lawyer Lawrence Buterman countered that the FTC's view doesn't reflect the "commercial reality" of the handbag market where customers are inundated with choice in that price range.
"The commercial reality is that customers have a Gucci bag lined up next to a Kors bag, lined up next to a Calvin Klein bag," he said.
The FTC's market definitions are also a key issue in its case to block supermarket chain Kroger's KR.N acquisition of Albertsons ACI.N, currently in trial in Portland, Oregon.
MONITOR 'EVERY MOVE'
In her opening statement, FTC Chief Trial Counsel Nicole Lindquist told U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon that the brunt of a Tapestry and Capri merger would be borne by "the working and middle class women of America," by reducing competition and innovation and raising prices.
The FTC presented emails showing how Capri's CEO John Idol and his team closely monitored Coach's pricing to stay competitive.
"Look at these prices!" Idol wrote in one of the emails after browsing Coach's outlet website. Idol urged his deputies to come up with better designs and solutions to compete against Coach. In another email produced by the FTC, Idol asks to talk to a deputy about the design of a Coach handbag.
"They monitor and react to each other's every move," said Lindquist, the FTC lawyer.
Capri's lawyer said that Michael Kors has been losing relevance since 2016, and that growing competition had reduced the average price of a Kors handbag to $92, below the FTC's threshold for accessible luxury.
Philippa Newman, President of Accessories and Footwear for Michael Kors, also testified on Monday saying this loss of relevance has led it to lose retail customers like Nordstrom JWN.N and discontinue product lines.
She explained that one reason for discontinuing the Parker handbag line was that, despite its high quality, akin to a
"Rolls Royce" of handbags, (the Kors customer) "only wants to pay for a Fiat."
The case marks a busy September for the FTC, which is also challenging how Alphabet's GOOGL.O monetizes advertising through a system that prosecutors say harms news publishers.
Monday's trial is expected to last for a week and a half, featuring witness testimonies from Tapestry CEO Joanne Crevoiserat and designer Michael Kors over the coming days.
The trial follows the merger's approval by antitrust regulators in Japan and the European Union earlier this year.
Reporting by Siddharth Cavale in New York; editing by Diane Craft, Chizu Nomiyama and Aurora Ellis
Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
