Airbus A321XLR jetliner stages maiden flight
By Jan Schwartz
HAMBURG, June 15 (Reuters) - Airbus AIR.PA on Wednesday staged the maiden flight of its newest and largest narrowbody airliner, the A321XLR, as the European planemaker seeks to capitalise on lucrative demand for long-range single-aisle jets.
The twin-engined passenger jet took off at 11:05 a.m. (0905 GMT) from a factory in Hamburg, Germany, ahead of more than a year of trials before the latest addition to Airbus's best-selling A320 medium-haul family enters service in 2024.
Shares in the European manufacturer rose 0.6%.
Airbus is pitching the A321XLR as a game-changing addition to its narrowbody fleet, making it possible for airlines to serve thinly flown long-distance routes profitably, rather than forcing passengers to fly indirectly via wide-body hubs.
It says the A321XLR can fly 4,700 nautical miles (8,700 km), 15% further than its most capable current narrowbody, allowing airlines to fly routes like Houston-Santiago, New York-Rome or Tokyo-Sydney without the cost of a bigger twin-aisle jet.
The extra range is made possible by the addition of a new rear-centre fuel tank moulded into the lower fuselage.
But Airbus faces questions from regulators over the risk of fire in the event of a belly landing and has been forced to delay the entry to service by at least three months to early 2024 to allow the lower structure to be modified.
AIM TO PRESERVE RANGE TARGET
The weight of any strengthening material could crimp the jet's range, one of its key selling points, analysts say.
Gary O'Donnell, the Airbus executive in charge of the A321XLR programme, told reporters his "aim" was to deliver the new jet to customers with the 4,700 km range previously advertised.
Industry sources have told Reuters addressing the design problem could take 6-9 months or even up to a year.
Industry publication Leeham News reported this week that some of the plane's airline customers also believe certification could be delayed by up to a year as regulators worldwide take a tougher stand in the wake of a Boeing BA.N safety crisis.
No target date has been established for certification or the first A321XLR delivery, industry sources have said.
In a rare intervention, Boeing last year expressed concerns about fire risks from its rival's design.
The U.S. planemaker is meanwhile racing to complete certification of its competing 737 MAX 10 jet before a new safety standard takes effect at the end of the year.
Its shares rose 5% on Wednesday after a smaller version of the MAX conducted test flights in China in a sign that the jet's return in China could be nearing after long delays.
Reporting by Jan Schwartz Writing by Tim Hepher Editing by Kirsten Donovan and Mark Potter
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.