Audit breakthrough fails to lure investors into China ADRs
By Summer Zhen
HONG KONG, Sept 29 (Reuters) - Global fund managers have been selling U.S.-listed Chinese stocks and the index tracking them is sagging badly, suggesting progress toward resolving disputes over their accounts has not been enough to shake investors' fears about the sector's outlook.
As of last Friday, U.S. long-only funds - or funds that do not short stocks - and hedge fund managers were net sellers of such stocks through the third quarter, data from Morgan Stanley strategists showed as of last Friday. It gave no dollar figure for the sell-off, though it has weighed on prices.
The Nasdaq Golden Dragon Index .HXC , which tracks them, has fallen more than 14% since an apparent breakthrough in a long dispute over their compliance with U.S. audit requirements, underperforming the S&P 500 .SPX and the Hang Seng .HSI .
Chinese stocks trade in the United States as American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) - U.S. securities that represent foreign shares of a foreign company.
Investors say hopes that the progress made may have improved sentiment towards Chinese ADRs, which include out-of-favour online giants Alibaba BABA.N and JD.com JD.O , have been dashed by a flight out of all kinds of risky assets as global interest rates rise.
"We had been through probably three cycles of optimism in 2022. Every time, there's another wind comes in that nobody could have seen," said Andy Maynard, global head of equities at China Renaissance Securities.
"First was the war, then we had Pelosi's trip to Taiwan, and now we have inflation," he said, referring to fighting in Ukraine and an August trip by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that ratcheted up Sino-U.S. and Taiwan strait tensions.
U.S. regulators had long disputed China's refusal to grant them full access to company accountants and audit papers, which had threatened their listings. But a deal struck in August has paved the way for audit inspections to begin this month.
After an initial warm response, investor attention has drifted away. Trading volume in Alibaba, for example, is in decline and what little price support has been seen across the sector seems to have come mainly from short covering.
One-fifth of the short bets were covered by hedge funds during the quarter, according to Morgan Stanley's strategists. They said long-only managers are waiting for some better economic news from China before adding exposure.
Both Alibaba and Tencent ADR TCEHY.PK are down more than 30% this year, while the Hang Seng Index .HSI dropped more than 25% and the Shanghai Shenzhen CSI 300 Index .CSI300 was down over 20%.
Reporting by Summer Zhen; Editing by Tom Westbrook and Ana Nicolaci da Costa
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.