Banks make slow progress on UK gender pay, while gap widens for insurers
By Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers
LONDON, Oct 4 (Reuters) - Major banks in Britain made a slight dent in their gender pay gaps last year, according to a Reuters analysis, though industry observers say they still have a long way to go. Several insurers went backwards.
Companies in Britain with more than 250 employees have been required to publish the difference between the pay and bonuses of their male and female employees since 2017.
They got a reprieve last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic - though many still filed data - and had an extra six months to publish data for 2019/2020. The deadline is Oct. 5.
The financial services sector has typically shown one of the largest gender pay gaps in Britain, often attributed to a lack of women in senior jobs.
Reuters collated pay gap data from 21 major financial institutions, which showed a narrowing in their average mean gender pay gap of just 0.4 percentage points to 33.4% in the year to April 2020, from 33.8% in 2019.
Banks alone had a pay gap which narrowed by one percentage point.
The mean average gender pay gap for all UK employers in the year ending April 2019 was 14.6%.
"The UK's financial services industry has often been singled out," said Ann Francke, chief executive of the Chartered Management Institute.
"It really does have to get its house in order - the industry is a huge employer in the UK and it has a real opportunity to lead by example."
Goldman Sachs had the widest gender pay gap in the year to April 2020 among the companies surveyed by Reuters, though the gap narrowed more than at other banks compared with a year earlier.
Goldman posted a gender pay gap of 51.8%, a tightening of 1.4 percentage points. The bank told staff in a memo in April that narrowing the gap further was a "critical priority" and its firmwide goal was to have 40% representation of women at vice president level by 2025.
"There is clearly more still to be done," a spokesperson for banking lobby group UK Finance said, adding many of its members had committed to the government's Women in Finance Charter.
FTSE 100 insurers Prudential PRU.L , Legal & General LGEN.L and M&G MNG.L reported a widening in their pay gaps, according to government filings and company reports.
Prudential's UK gender pay gap widened to 45.2% from 40.3%, which the Asia-focused insurer attributed in its latest gender pay gap report at least in part to the spin-out of its UK life insurer and asset manager M&G in 2019.
However, M&G also reported a widening in its pay gap in the most recent year, to 30.5% from 25%.
"We are determined to narrow our gender pay gap and will do this by achieving better representation of women in all roles at all levels of our organisation, especially in leadership positions," an M&G spokesperson said by email.
Legal & General's mean gender pay gap widened to 30.8% from 27.6%.
"Legal & General is tackling the underlying causes of its pay gap by creating a more diverse workforce and a more inclusive culture through sustained, long-term action," the insurer said in its latest gender pay report.
Among the large firms surveyed by Reuters, only insurer Admiral ADML.L had a gender pay gap lower than the most recently published average across all sectors. Admiral had a gender pay gap last year of 12.8%.
The 21 firms surveyed were Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, Standard Chartered, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs International, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, PGMS (a Phoenix unit), abrdn, Schroder Investment Management, St James's Place, Legal & General, Prudential, Admiral Group, Aviva and M&G.
Slow progress: Finance firms edge down gender pay gaps Link
Reporting by Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers; Editing by Jan
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.