BHP gets Australian shareholder support for climate plan
By Melanie Burton
MELBOURNE, Nov 11 (Reuters) - BHP Group said it had won approval for its climate roadmap on Thursday, overcoming a protest vote on concerns that some of the long-term plans lacked detail, with Australia-based shareholder proxies voting 86% in favour.
The world's biggest listed miner aims for net zero emissions by 2050 for its customers, including the heavily polluting steel industry. But BHP BHP.AX has stopped short of setting a target, in view of uncertainty over how technology will develop.
"BHP's climate action transition plans are well developed and ... have been strongly endorsed by our shareholders," Chairman Ken MacKenzie said after the results of the poll were released at its annual general meeting.
"We have clear goals and targets in place."
BHP expected to spend $2 billion to $4 billion on the initiative by 2030, he added.
Australia-based shareholders make up 58% of BHP's register, which is split between London and Sydney.
Proxy advisers Glass Lewis, and London's Local Authority Pension Fund Forum (LAPFF) had recommended that investors vote against the plan, with the first saying BHP was not specific enough about disclosures of customer emissions.
"Just three weeks after Rio Tinto committed to cutting its operational emissions by 50% by 2030, BHP shareholders have rubber stamped a 2030 target that is sorely lacking in ambition ... and leaves BHP lagging behind nearly all of its global mining peers," Dan Gocher, climate director for the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said.
BHP's climate transition plan commits it to at least a 30% cut on its direct and indirect emissions by 2030 on 2020 levels.
Raising the stakes for its peers, Fortescue Metals Group FMG.AX last month set a 2040 target to achieve net zero customer emissions.
About 83% of BHP Plc's investors voted in favour of the resolution at its annual general meeting in London last month.
BHP has also been reshaping its portfolio to better match its climate targets, saying this week it would sell a stake in BHP Mitsui Coal (BMC), a metallurgical coal joint venture in the northeastern state of Queensland.
However, it has proved tougher to shift its New South Wales energy coal business, which is now halfway through a two-year sale process, MacKenzie said.
"Cards on the table it’s challenging," he said, in response to a question whether BHP could hold on to, and responsibly wind down, the Australian unit. "All options remain on the table."
Reporting by Melanie Burton; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and Alexander Smith
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.