EU advisers concerned about plan for green labels on gas, nuclear investments



* Expert group to give feedback on EU proposal by Friday

* Draft rules 'not well suited' to green financial products

* Chief of EU advisers flags concerns over draft proposal (Updates with European Commission comment)

By Simon Jessop and Kate Abnett

LONDON/BRUSSELS, Jan 17 (Reuters) - Experts advising on the European Union's sustainable finance taxonomy are concerned a draft plan to include gas and nuclear relies too heavily on promises to make those fuels green in future, rather than assessing their real impact today.

Nathan Fabian, who chairs the expert group, said some advisers were concerned the draft risked hurting the taxonomy's mission to provide clarity to investors about the environmental impact of investments.

"The new criteria do have weaknesses that mean that they're not well suited to sustainable finance products," Fabian told Reuters on Monday, ahead of a Friday deadline for the group to give feedback on the European Commission's draft proposal.

Under the draft plan, seen by Reuters, gas plants can earn a green label if they meet criteria including an emissions limit of 270g of CO2 equivalent per kWh, or if their annual emissions average 550kg CO2e per kW or less over 20 years.

That would judge the environmental performance of a gas plant over 20 years, with no guarantee that its emissions would drop over time, said Fabian, who is also Chief Responsible Investment Officer at the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment.

"So it's possible to have very high emissions in the start and then for the asset simply to fall out of taxonomy alignment later in its life but still operate," he said.

That could also throw up problems for asset managers who choose to assess the taxonomy alignment of activities in a fund based on revenue - since they would be assessing an activity's current revenue based on the activity's expected green credentials decades into the future.

"If I invest in the turnover of that plant today, I've effectively got taxonomy alignment from very high emissions - and that is a mismatch in what the financial product can claim and what the objective of these criteria are," Fabian said.

A Commission spokesperson said the taxonomy would only recognise investments that commit to accelerating the EU's green transition.

"The inclusion of nuclear or natural gas comes with clear and tight conditions associated with its use in line with our climate targets and with safeguards against significant environmental harm," the spokesperson said.

Fabian also said the draft rules for nuclear have raised questions among the advisers, including whether a plant can guarantee its green credentials today, if its obligation to manage nuclear waste - one of the main environmental concerns about the fuel - does not kick in until as late as 2050.
Editing by Jane Merriman

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website. Read more or change your cookie settings.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.