India agency sends notices to Deutsche, HSBC, Citi in Xiaomi royalty case
Adds details from financial crime agency in paragraphs 6 and 7
By Aditya Kalra and Shubhendu Deshmukh
NEW DELHI, June 9 (Reuters) -India's financial crime agency on Friday said notices had been issued to Xiaomi 1810.HK, Deutsche Bank DBKGn.DE, HSBC HSBA.L and Citigroup C.N over alleged illegal remittances made by the Chinese smartphone giant to foreign entities.
An appellate authority at the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued the so-called show cause notices under India's foreign exchange laws for alleged illegal remittances of 55.51 billion rupees ($673.2 million). The funds have been frozen by the agency since last year.
Show cause notices are typically issued to a company to ask it why the federal agency should not proceed to take action against it for wrongdoing.
Xiaomi and the three banks did not respond to requests for comment.
India alleges Xiaomi's local unit made illegal remittances to foreign entities by passing them off as royalty payments. The Chinese company has previously said those payments were all legitimate and that it will "continue to use all means to protect the reputation and interests".
The notices were issued to Xiaomi and officials including the chief financial officer of its India unit, the ED said in a statement.
The banks received notices because they allegedly allowed foreign remittances described as royalty payments without conducting due diligence and obtaining necessary documentation, the agency added.
Reuters reported last year Indian investigators had alleged during their probe that Xiaomi misled its banker Deutsche for years by claiming it had an agreement for payment of royalties when it had none.
Court documents show Xiaomi's frozen assets are spread across accounts at various banks including Deutsche, Citi and HSBC.
The Chinese company is one of India's leading smartphone players, having grown rapidly in recent years by offering budget smartphones. It competes with Samsung Electronics 005930.KS and other Chinese brands in the booming South Asian market.
Xiaomi last year told a court that the asset freeze was "severely disproportionate" and had effectively halted its operations in India. In April, an Indian court rejected Xiaomi's request to lift the freeze.
Reporting by Aditya Kalra and Shubhendu Deshmukh; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta and Jamie Freed
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
