Investors dumped oil as banking crisis erupted: Kemp
Repeats Wednesday's column with no changes to the text
By John Kemp
LONDON, March 22 (Reuters) -Portfolio investors dumped petroleum futures and options at one of the fastest rates on record in the early stages of the banking crisis, as traders anticipated an increased probability of a recession hitting oil consumption.
Hedge funds and other money managers sold the equivalent of 139 million barrels in the six most important futures and options contracts over the seven days ending March 14.
The volume of sales was the 12th largest in the 522 weeks since ICE Futures Europe and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission started to publish records in this form in 2013.
Fund managers have sold a total of 148 million barrels since the end of January, taking their combined position to 432 million barrels (20th percentile for all weeks since 2013).
In the most recent week, there were heavy sales of Brent (-65 million barrels), NYMEX and ICE WTI (-59 million), U.S. gasoline (-12 million) and European gas oil (-7 million), with only minor buying of U.S. diesel (+4 million).
Investors have become much more cautious about the outlook for oil prices since the end of January in response to persistent inflation, rising interest rates and a crisis of confidence engulfing banks in North America and Europe.
Bullish long positions outnumber bearish long positions by a ratio of 3.42:1 (37th percentile) down from 5.93:1 (80th percentile) on January 24.
Chartbook: Investor positions in petroleum
In November 2022, far more U.S. banks expected to expand their balance sheets over the next six months (26 out of 80 institutions) than reduce it (8 of 80), according to the Federal Reserve’s Senior Financial Officer Survey.
As recently as January 2023, only a minority of banks said they had tightened credit standards, imposed tougher conditions or increased spreads over the last three months, according to the Fed’s Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey.
In the wake of the banking crisis however, credit conditions in North America and Europe are set to tighten significantly as banks fortify their balance sheets to protect themselves against possible runs.
Stress-driven tightening will amplify the tightening already underway as a result of central-bank driven interest rate increases.
Reduced credit availability to households and businesses, hitting the most marginal borrowers hardest, is an extra headwind that will likely lead to slower economic growth and a lower trajectory for petroleum consumption.
- U.S. bank failure places oil prices under pressure (March 13, 2023)
John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own
Editing by Jan Harvey
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.