XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Tesla tells judge that shareholder vote should reverse Musk pay ruling

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Tesla tells judge that shareholder vote should reverse Musk pay ruling</title></head><body>

Tesla argues shareholder vote fixes issues in Musk's pay package

Plaintiff's legal team claims shareholder vote has no legal impact

Musk's pay package worth around $48 billion at Friday's share price

By Tom Hals

WILMINGTON, Delaware, June 21 (Reuters) -A Delaware judge should recognize a vote by Tesla shareholders in favor of Elon Musk's $56 billion pay package and reverse her January ruling that voided the compensation, the company said in a filing that was made public on Friday.

In addition, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick should not consider a request for a record $6 billion legal fee by the lawyers that led the case against Musk's 2018 pay package, according to the filing in Delaware's Court of Chancery.

Tesla and the legal team for Richard Tornetta, the shareholder who sued over the pay package, are wrestling over the best way to resolve the case and compensate the company's chief executive.

Musk said earlier this year that unless he had a larger stake in Tesla he would prefer to build some products outside the company, creating uncertainty about his future while Tesla is struggling with slower sales and stiffer competition.

Tesla's investors voted on June 13 in favor of the package of stock options. Many investors said they felt Musk should be rewarded because the value of the company increased more than 10 times after the pay package was originally agreed in 2018.

Tesla said in the court filing that the judge should determine the impact of the shareholder vote, which in turn could drastically reduce the legal fee.

It said that it plans to make a motion to reverse the January ruling and that it should now win the case.

The company has argued that by having the pay package reviewed by an independent board member and reapproved by shareholders it fixed McCormick's finding that Musk dominated the pay negotiations and that shareholders lacked key information in the 2018 vote.

Tornetta's legal team has rejected that approach. They argued the shareholder vote on Musk's pay had no legal impact and even Tesla has acknowledged that the process to reverse a legal opinion through a vote was "novel."

The shareholder lawyers want a decision on their legal fee as the next step in the case.

When the company achieved the last milestone in the pay package, it was worth $56 billion, according to Tesla. The package is worth around $48 billion at Friday's share price of $182.19.

Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Matthew Lewis


Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.