Biden’s antitrust playbook values shots on goal
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Ben Winck
WASHINGTON, Jan 25 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Joe Biden is reaching deep into history to sustain his attack on perceived anticompetitive behavior. In addition to targeting a 15-year-old Google deal, the U.S. president’s trustbusters are dusting off an arcane law to probe potential price discrimination. The broader strategy will keep big companies on their toes.
The latest Federal Trade Commission investigation hinges on the 1936 Robinson-Patman Act, which bars suppliers from offering large chains discounts at the expense of smaller peers. It was designed to crack down on the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, which dominated the grocery industry at the time. Coca-Cola KO.N and PepsiCo PEP.O are today’s guinea pigs, according to a Politico report. A statement from the agency suggests the pharmaceutical industry could be next.
Reviving Robinson-Patman is part of a larger effort by the White House to curb perceived harm from consolidation. Biden signed an executive order to ramp up antitrust inquiries, citing excessive merger activity for lifting prices. The FTC’s newest commissioner, Alvaro Bedoya, also invoked the price discrimination law, which hasn’t been used since a settlement with spice-maker McCormick MKC.N in 2000, during a speech.
A 2018 study found that three-quarters of U.S. industries have grown increasingly consolidated over the last two decades, helping boost profit margins, but recent events also theoretically bolster the case. In the third quarter, Coca-Cola raised prices by 12% compared to 3% broadly for nonalcoholic beverages, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pepsi jacked up its drink and snack prices by 17%, far higher than the national average. The companies cited higher costs, but their bottom lines grew by even more than what they were charging customers.
This aggressive antitrust approach has produced only mixed results, however. The government successfully blocked the merger of book publishers Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster, but also has lost three times in court, leaving UnitedHealth UNH.N, Booz Allen Hamilton BAH.N and Illumina ILMN.O to proceed with their challenged transactions.
The administration keeps trying different angles. A bold effort to block the Microsoft-Activision Blizzard deal is pending. The Justice Department sued Alphabet’s Google on Tuesday, arguing that the search giant abused its market dominance in advertising following acquisitions in the 2010s. There was a time when competition authorities preferred a clearer path to score against what it considered monopolistic behavior. Biden’s playbook values taking as many shots as possible.
Follow @BenWinck on Twitter
CONTEXT NEWS
The U.S. Justice Department on Jan. 24 filed a lawsuit against Alphabet-owned Google alleging the search giant abused its dominance in digital advertising. In the complaint, regulators argue that Google used “anticompetitive, exclusionary, and unlawful means to eliminate or severely diminish any threat to its dominance over digital advertising technologies.”
Separately, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, under the Robinson-Patman Act, is investigating Coca-Cola and PepsiCo over potential soft-drink price discrimination, Politico reported on Jan. 18, citing unnamed sources.
Referencing the rarely used 1936 law, Alvaro Bedoya, who joined the agency as a commissioner in May, said in a speech on Sept. 22 that the FTC should focus on fairness in antitrust enforcement.
U.S. President Joe Biden enacted an executive order on “promoting competition in the American economy” on July 9, 2021, tasking the FTC with reviewing potential violations of the Robinson-Patman Act, among other antitrust rules.
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Amanda Gomez
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
