British lawmakers seek judicial review of hedging redress scheme



By Huw Jones

LONDON, Jan 17 (Reuters) - Lawmakers are pursuing a judicial review of a decision not to widen a British redress scheme for businesses that were missold interest rate 'hedging' products, saying that this had allowed banks to reduce compensation payouts by 10 billion pounds.

Thousands of small businesses received 2.2 billion pounds ($3 billion) from nine banks, including HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland under the redress scheme, which was set up nearly a decade ago for products missold from 2001.

But an independent review said last month Link(Reuters),lawyer%20of%20the%20regulator 's%20actions that excluding about 10,000 sales of the products, which were supposed to protect businesses from rising interest rates, from the scheme, a third of the total, was an "inadequate regulatory response".

When rates fell, companies who bought the products found they had to pay crippling extra charges, often running to tens of thousands of pounds.

The review said that the FCA, after representations from some banks, agreed to exclude "sophisticated" customers, defined as businesses having two of three characteristics of a turnover of more than 6.5 million pounds, a balance sheet of more than 3.26 million pounds or more than 50 employees, from the scheme.

There was no explanation why the change was agreed by the regulator, the review said.

"The regulator cannot produce any evidence to support the decision or even remember what the reasons were for excluding so many victims. Meanwhile they cleared the way for banks to knock up to 10 billion pounds off their compensation bill," Kevin Hollinrake, who co-chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on fair business banking said in a statement on Monday.

The group said that it had called on FCA CEO Nikhil Rathi to reconsider after the watchdog said in December that further action would not be appropriate or proportionate.

It said it was now filing an application for a judicial review, which refers to a judge reviewing the legitimacy of decisions taken by a public body.

An spokesperson for the FCA said it was a very different organisation from the one that existed when the products were sold and when the voluntary redress scheme was established.

"We have accepted many of the recommendations from the independent review," the spokesperson added.

($1 = 0.7311 pounds)
Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Alexander Smith

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

我們運用 cookies 提供您最佳之網頁使用經驗。更改您的cookie 設定跟詳情。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明