EPA proposes expanded sales of higher ethanol blend gasoline in US Midwest
Adds detail, recasts first paragraph, adds API trade group comment
By Stephanie Kelly and Jarrett Renshaw
NEW YORK, March 1 (Reuters) -The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed a rule that would allow sales of gasoline with a higher ethanol blend in certain U.S. Midwest states - awin for corn growers but a potential logistical challenge for the oil industry.
The proposal comes in response to a request from thegovernors of corn-producing Midwestern states including Iowa, Nebraska and Illinois, that the agency lift an effective ban on E15, or fuel containing 15% ethanol, to lower pump prices and help farmers.
The EPA's proposal would take effect in the summer of 2024, a year later than the governors had requested.
Reuters reported the proposed rulemaking on Tuesday.
The EPA enforces summertime regulations preventing E15 sales because of concerns it contributes to smog in hot weather. Research has shown, however, that E15 may not increase smog more than E10, which is sold year-round and contains 10% ethanol.
Proponents of the EPA's proposal say that increased E15 supply would lower pump prices by expanding the volume of available fuel, andhelp farmers in the meantime.
However, critics of the idea - including those in the refining industry - have voiced concerns that a piecemeal approach to augmenting E15 sales could lead to distribution challenges.
Both the biofuel and oil industries have said they would prefer a nationwide policy allowing E15.
The EPA will hold a public hearing for the proposed rule in late March or early April 2023, it said.
The American Petroleum Institute, an oil group, said major changes to the fuel infrastructure system will be needed to accomplish the governors' request, because high ethanol fuel grades require different equipment.
The API expects an additional one or two years beyond 2024 will be needed to minimize impacts to consumers, said Will Hupman, API's vice president of downstream policy.
The oil refining industry has traditionally balked at efforts to expand the ethanol market because it competes with gasoline at the pump and can be costly to blend.
TIGHTER FUEL SUPPLIES?
The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, an oil trade group, said late on Tuesday that implementing a new fuel blend in select states in 2024 would create issues, including leaving the Midwest region with tighter fuel supplies during the peak summer driving season.
"Not every refinery, pipeline and terminal serving the Midwest has the ability to seamlessly produce, transport and store a new blend of gasoline, and it could take years to permit and complete infrastructure projects to resolve this," said Patrick Kelly, AFPM's senior director of fuels and vehicle policy.
The rule could cost the Midwest's fuel supply chain and consumers $500-$800 million per year, Kelly added.
The biofuel industry gave a mixed response to the announcement.
The Renewable Fuels Association said it was glad to see the EPA taking action, but disappointed that it was a year later than the governors had requested.
"By law, EPA should have finalized approval of the governors' petition more than seven months ago, which would have given the marketplace more than enough time to adjust and prepare for implementation this summer," said Geoff Cooper, the RFA's chief executive.
Members of the biofuel industry say E15 saves consumers money. Drivers saved an average of 16 cents per gallon this past summer because of E15, said Growth Energy Chief Executive Emily Skor.
U.S. PresidentJoe Biden lifted the ban last summer to try to lower historically-high gasoline prices.
A NATIONWIDE, LEGISLATIVE FIX
Some in the oil industry are so opposed to a piecemeal approach to E15, that in November they supported for the first time a bill to expand nationwide sales of E15.
The legislation was introduced by Senator Deb Fischer from Nebraska and Senator Amy Klobuchar from Minnesota and supported by the American Petroleum Institute.
Both oil and biofuel groups this week reiterated that a nationwide, legislative fix would be the best solution.
"A legislative approach that addresses the needs of all stakeholders would provide a more durable and less disruptive solution than creating requirements for costly new fuel blends," AFPM's Kelly said.
Reporting by Stephanie Kelly and Jarrett Renshaw; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama,Barbara Lewis and Marguerita Choy
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
