Hermes wins U.S. trademark trial over 'MetaBirkin' NFTs

<html xmlns=""><head><title>UPDATE 2-Hermes wins U.S. trademark trial over 'MetaBirkin' NFTs</title></head><body>

Updates headline, adds verdict details, background

By Blake Brittain

Feb 8 (Reuters) -A Manhattan federal jury on Wednesday concluded that an artist's non-fungible token versions of Hermes' HRMS.PA famous Birkin bags violated the French fashion house's trademark rights.

In one of the first intellectual-property trials over the popular digital tokens known as NFTs, the jury found artist Mason Rothschild's unauthorized "MetaBirkins" were likely to confuse consumers.

The jury awarded Hermes $133,000 in damages for trademark infringement, dilution, and cybersquatting, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed.

Rothschild's attorneyRhett Millsaps called the result a"terrible day for artists and the First Amendment." Representatives for Hermes did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The case has been closely watched for its potential to clarify how trademark law will apply to NFTs, which are unique tokens on blockchain networks often used to verify ownership of digital art.

Hermes' prized leather Birkin handbags typically sell for tens of thousands of dollars each. The company has sold over $1 billion worth of Birkins in the United States, including more than $100 million worth in the past ten years, according to a court document.

The fashion house sued Rothschild last year over his MetaBirkins, 100 NFTs associated with images depicting the bags covered in colorful fur.

Hermes in its lawsuit called Rothschild a "digital speculator" and the NFTs a "get rich quick" scheme. It said Rothschild began offering the NFTs at the Art Basel art fair in Miami in December 2021, and over $1 million worth of them had been traded by early the next month.

The luxury house has its own plans for NFTs that Rothschild hindered, it said in a court filing.

Rothschild, whose legal name is Sonny Estival, argued that the works are an absurdist statement on luxury goods and immune from the lawsuit based on First Amendment protections for art.

The case is Hermes International v. Rothschild, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:22-cv-00384.

Editing by David Bario and Diane Craft


免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。


本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

我們運用 cookies 提供您最佳之網頁使用經驗。更改您的cookie 設定跟詳情。