Top banks say London forex rigging case filed too late

By Kirstin Ridley

LONDON, Sept 29 (Reuters) - Eight of the world's biggest banks, including Deutsche Bank DBKGn.DE , Goldman Sachs GS.N and Bank of America BAC.N , say it is unfair to rope them into a vast London lawsuit over alleged collusion in the foreign exchange market.

The banks, which were sued in 2020 by 11 investment fund groups such as Allianz, PIMCO, BlueCrest and Brevan Howard, told London's specialist Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on Thursday the claims against them had simply been filed too late.

"We have invested a huge amount of time and money defending claims we say are time-barred," said Kieron Beal, a lawyer representing the banks, requesting that the court deal with so-called limitation arguments before proceeding further.

Around 175 investment and pension funds, formed into 11, heavyweight claimant groups, are suing a total of 14 banks in London and the United States to seek hefty but unquantified damages for alleged forex collusion between 2003 and 2013.

The European Commission fined banks more than 1.0 billion euros ($976 million) in 2019 over forex cartels with names such as "Essex Express" and "Three Way Banana Split".

But lawyers for the claimants allege they have identified more widespread bank misconduct than the chatrooms the European Commission was examining.

The case hit the headlines in 2020 after claimants brought on board former Barclays BARC.L and BNP BNPP.PA trader Jason Katz, who pleaded guilty in a related criminal case - and paid him $400 per hour as a consultant.

Claimant lawyers say they filed two identical cases - the first in 2018 against six banks - Barclays, Citibank C.N , HSBC HSBA.L , JP Morgan JPM.N , NatWest NWG.L and UBS UBSG.S - and a second against a further eight banks in 2020.

Marie Demetriou, a lawyer for the claimants, said allowing the second group of defendants to seek a preliminary decision on limitation would lead to an unacceptable delay and the potential "nightmare scenario" of two identical future trials if the two cases could not then be managed jointly.

"Our only concern is delay," agreed Sarah Abram, a lawyer for the original defendant group.

"We are six global banks accused of unlawful conduct over a decade in proceedings hanging over us for four years that have already been subject to enormous drift," she said.

Some of the world's biggest investment banks have already paid more than a combined $11 billion in fines to settle U.S., British and European regulatory allegations that traders manipulated currency rates for years.

The CAT judge said he would "reflect on the arguments". ($1 = 1.0244 euros)
Reporting by Kirstin Ridley; Editing by Hugh Lawson

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。


本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

我們運用 cookies 提供您最佳之網頁使用經驗。更改您的cookie 設定跟詳情。