OpenAI hit with new lawsuits from news outlets over AI training
The Intercept, Raw Story, AlterNet accuse OpenAI of misusing articles
News outlets join New York Times in suing OpenAI over copyrights
By Blake Brittain
Feb 28 (Reuters) -News organizations The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet sued OpenAI in New York federal court on Wednesday, accusing the Microsoft-backed MSFT.O company of misusing their articles to train the artificial-intelligence system behind its popular chatbot ChatGPT.
The two lawsuits said that thousands of the outlets' articles were used to train ChatGPT to respond to human prompts, and that the chatbot reproduces their copyrighted material "verbatim or nearly verbatim" when prompted.
The lawsuits specifically accused OpenAI of violating a federal copyright law known as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by removing copyright-identifying information like authors and titles from the articles to facilitate infringement.
The organizations asked the court for monetary damages of at least $2,500 per violation and an order that would force OpenAI to stop misusing their work.
The Intercept's lawsuit also names Microsoft, OpenAI's largest financial backer, as a defendant and accuses its OpenAI-powered Bing AI chatbot of violating its rights.
Representatives for OpenAI and Microsoft did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the complaints.
Raw Story publisher Roxanne Cooper said in a statement that OpenAI "taught ChatGPT to ignore journalists' copyrights and hide its use of copyright-protected material." Raw Story's owners acquired AlterNet in 2018.
The Intercept's CEO Annie Chabel said she hopes the lawsuit will "send a strong message to AI developers who chose to ignore our copyrights and free ride on the hard work of our journalists."
OpenAI and other tech companies are facing several lawsuits in the U.S. from copyright owners including authors, visual artists and music publishers over the data used to train their generative AI systems. A complaint filed by the New York Times against OpenAI in December was the first such lawsuit from a media outlet.
Tech companies have said their AI systems make fair use of copyrighted material and that the lawsuits threaten the growth of the potential multitrillion-dollar AI industry. OpenAI also accused the Times on Monday of "hacking" its systems to create misleading evidence that its chatbot unlawfully reproduces the newspaper's articles.
The Times responded yesterday that it was "simply using OpenAI's products to look for evidence that they stole and reproduced The Times's copyrighted work."
The cases are Raw Story Media v. OpenAI Inc, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-01514 and The Intercept Media Inc v. OpenAI Inc, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-01515.
For the news outlets: Matt Topic, Jonathan Loevy and Michael Kanovitz of Loevy + Loevy
For OpenAI: attorney information not yet available
Read more:
NY Times sues OpenAI, Microsoft for infringing copyrighted works
OpenAI says New York Times 'hacked' ChatGPT to build copyright lawsuit
Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
