US lukewarm on G7 Russian diamond ban after industry backlash
Adds dropped words in quote in paragraph 14
Ban aims to curb another revenue stream for Russia
Biden administration official says US still engaged in G7 talks
Says needs to take into account African, UAE, industry concerns
By Julia Payne and Dmitry Zhdannikov
BRUSSELS/LONDON, May 17 (Reuters) -The United States is re-evaluating the strictest elements of a ban on Russian diamonds from the Group of Seven major democracies, after opposition from African countries, Indian gem polishers and New York jewellers, seven sources said.
The sanctions package, agreed in December and including a ban across the European Union, represents one of the industry's biggest shakeups in decades.
Two of the sources familiar with the negotiations said the Americans had disconnected from G7 working groups on the stringent controls, with one describing them as "there but not engaging".
The U.S. State Department declined to comment.
A senior Biden administration official said Washington had not changed its position and that the United States would keep working with the G7.
"We will want to make sure that we strike the right balance between hurting Russia and making sure that everything is implementable," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The G7 sanctions aim to hit another stream of revenue for the Kremlin's war effort in Ukraine, even though at around $3.5 billion, according to Russian state-run miner Alrosa's ALRS.MM 2023 results, diamonds represent a small fraction of the profits Moscow earns from oil and gas.
Since March, importers to G7 countries must self-certify that diamonds do not originate from Russia, the world's leading producer of rough diamonds. Sanctions were imposed on direct imports of Russian gems in January.
From September, the EU ban will require diamonds of 0.5 carats and above to pass through Antwerp, a centuries-old diamond hub in Belgium, for traceability certification using blockchain - the digital ledger used by cryptocurrencies.
Sources said G7 powers had agreed that Antwerp would be the logical first hub, with others to be added later.
But three of the sources said Washington had cooled on enforcing traceability and that discussions on implementing tracing had stalled.
The Biden administration official said the commitment to implementing a traceability mechanism by Sept. 1 applied to the European Union, not the United States, citing the language in a G7 leaders' statement in December.
"We need to do this in a way that takes into account concerns from African partners and African producers, takes into account Indian and UAE partners ... and makes sure we can also make it workable for U.S. industry," said the official.
"Is there a traceability mechanism that satisfies all of that? We're still engaged, we haven't walked away from the idea... on the other hand, we couldn't sign up to definitely having this in place by Sept. 1st."
The presidents of Angola, Botswana and Namibia wrote to G7 leaders in February to say that a pre-determined entry point for the G7 market would be unfair, impinge on freedoms, and hurt revenues. The three nations account for 30% of diamond output.
Italy, which holds the presidency of the G7, declined to comment on the U.S. position.
Any softening of the phased ban risks leaving loopholes and allowing Russian diamonds into boutiques in New York, London and Tokyo - a threat highlighted when Belgian authorities seized suspected Russian stones worth millions of dollars in February.
Advocates of the sanctions say a traceability mechanism is needed to deliver a robust ban and that without the full engagement of the United States, which accounts for 50% of the G7 diamond jewellery market, it cannot be effective. They blamed some of the industry pushback on fears of greater market transparency.
A Belgian official familiar with the negotiations said it was paramount to maintain the determination to keep loopholes firmly closed.
CERTIFYING AT SOURCE
A previous U.S. ban on Russian diamonds excluded stones polished elsewhere, allowing diamonds processed in India and traded in hubs like Dubai to reach the U.S. market.
The G7 ban followed months of wrangling between Western capitals.
Diamond miners such as De Beers, a unit of Anglo American AAL.L, Indian cutters and jewellery retailers have strongly lobbied against the ban. They say the measures are poorly designed, will increase bureaucracy and inflate prices.
De Beers told Reuters it supported a ban but that diamond-producing countries should certify origin at the source.
"The opportunities for, and likelihood, of Russian diamonds infiltrating the legitimate supply chain are in fact higher when you move further away from the source," the company said.
Virginia Drosos, chief executive of Signet SIG.N, the world's largest retailer of diamond jewellery, urged the U.S. government in a letter seen by Reuters to "stand against... the G7 Belgian solution."
Belgium has introduced a pilot tracing scheme based in Antwerp in which some 20 diamond buyers are participating, among them French luxury groups LVMH LVMH.PA and Kering PRTP.PA as well as Switzerland's Richemont CFR.S, one of the sources said.
An LVMH spokesperson said its Tiffany & Co brand was participating. Kering and Richemont did not comment.
Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo told Reuters in March that he was open to additional hubs being established for certification if they matched Antwerp's standards, and that concerns were inevitable.
"If you implement something that is changing the game, (it) takes some time to iron out some issues."
Reporting by Julia Payne in Brussels and Dmitry Zhdannikov in London; additional reporting by Daphne Psaledakis in Washington, Brian Benza in Gaborone, Miguel Gomes in Luanda and Mimosa Spencer in Paris; editing by Richard Lough and Emelia Sithole-Matarise
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
