XM n’offre pas ses services aux résidents des États-Unis d’Amérique.

California court to weigh fate of law treating app-based drivers as contractors

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>California court to weigh fate of law treating app-based drivers as contractors</title></head><body>

By Daniel Wiessner

May 21 (Reuters) -California's top state court on Tuesday will consider a labor union's challenge to a ballot measure allowing app-based services such as Uber UBER.N and Lyft LYFT.O to classify drivers in the state as independent contractors rather than as employees with more benefits.

The seven-member California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in San Francisco in a lawsuit by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and four drivers who say the 2020 ballot measure known as Proposition 22 was unconstitutional.

Whether gig workers should be treated as employees or contractors is a crucial issue for the industry, as employees are entitled to the minimum wage, overtime pay, reimbursements for expenses and other protections that do not extend to independent contractors, who as a result can cost companies up to 30% less, according to several studies.

Uber, Lyft and other app-based services spent more than $200 million on a campaign to pass Prop 22 and have said that without it, the increased costs could force them to stop doing business in the largest U.S. state.

A study released on Monday by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, found that most gig drivers in five major U.S. cities - including Los Angeles and San Francisco - earn significantly less than the minimum wage when full costs are taken into account, including downtime. Drivers in California were paid less than their counterparts in Boston, Chicago and Seattle, according to the report.

Joseph Bryant, SEIU executive vice president, said the Prop 22 case is a key piece in a campaign to secure basic legal protections for gig workers across the country and "reverse more than a decade of exploitation."

"No matter the outcome, we will not be intimidated by corporations' unconstitutional attempts to dictate law in California," Bryant said in a statement.

The California Attorney General's office, which is defending Prop. 22, declined to comment, deferring to its filings in the case.

Protect App-Based Drivers and Services, an industry-backed group that has intervened in the case on behalf of the state, provided a statement from Stephanie Whitfield, an Instacart driver who said the flexibility of her job has allowed her to focus on her medical health while earning a living.

“It’s not just about me - it’s ensuring the people and families I deliver to are able to continue to have access to the services they rely on," Whitfield said.


California is just one front in a nationwide legal battle over the proper classification of gig drivers and other contract workers. Lawmakers in Minnesota passed a measure over the weekend that would set a minimum wage of $1.28 per mile and 31 cents per minute for gig drivers, replacing a higher minimum adopted by Minneapolis that spurred Uber and Lyft to threaten to cease operating in the city.

Earlier this month, the top court in Massachusetts heard arguments over whether competing ballot proposals that would redefine the relationship between app-based companies and drivers in that state should be allowed to go before voters in November. One proposal supported by industry groups mirrors Prop 22, while another would allow drivers to unionize.

And last week a trial kicked off in a lawsuit by the Massachusetts attorney general accusing Uber and Lyft of unlawfully classifying their drivers as contractors to avoid treating them as employees entitled to a minimum wage, overtime and earned sick time.

The U.S. Department of Labor, meanwhile, is contending with several legal challenges to a rule that would make it more difficult for companies in many industries, including app-based services, to treat workers as independent contractors.

Prop 22 was approved in November 2020 by nearly 60% of voters in California. It exempts app-based drivers from a 2019 state law known as AB5 that narrowed the circumstances in which many workers can be treated as contractors.

Instead, Prop 22 allows app-based transportation services to classify drivers as independent contractors as long as they are paid at least 120% of the minimum wage while passengers are in the car and receive expense reimbursements and subsidies to pay for health insurance.

A state judge in 2021 found that Prop 22 violated the state constitution because it limited the legislature's power to include gig drivers within the scope of California workers' compensation law.

A mid-level appeals court last year disagreed and revived the measure. That court said the California Constitution permits the state's electorate, along with the legislature, to make changes to the workers' compensation system.

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Aurora Ellis


Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.

Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.

Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.

Avertissement sur les risques : votre capital est à risque. Les produits à effet de levier ne sont pas recommandés pour tous. Veuillez consulter notre Divulgation des risques