XM levert geen diensten aan inwoners van de Verenigde Staten.

Four banks quit initiative assessing climate targets-sources



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>EXCLUSIVE-Four banks quit initiative assessing climate targets-sources</title></head><body>

Adds comment from Societe Generale in paragraph 10

By Tommy Wilkes

LONDON, Nov 29 (Reuters) -Four major banks, including Standard Chartered Plc STAN.L and HSBC Plc HSBA.L, have quit a United Nations-backed initiative to scrutinise climate targets set by corporations, according to people familiar with the matter.

The lenders have abandoned efforts for the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) to validate their goals because of concerns it could hinder their ability to continue financing fossil fuels, the sources said.

Some of the banks, which also include Societe Generale SA SOGN.PA and ABN Amro Bank NV ABNd.AS, have also raised concerns that SBTi's greenhouse gas emissions target-setting demands are too hard to meet, the sources added.

To justify their departures, which happened separately and over the past year, some of the banks cited their membership of another United Nations-backed grouping, the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), which is less prescriptive and allows lenders to continue to finance fossil fuels as long as they make progress on their emissions. Many lenders say they should finance fossil fuels as long as economies depend on them.

The departure of the four banks casts a shadow over the world's most widely adopted standard for curbing greenhouse gas emissions.

Launched as a non-profit, SBTi has certified that emissions targets of nearly 4,000 companies globally are aligned with the intergovernmental Paris agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

SBTi unveiled plans this year for a new standard that will apply specifically to financial institutions as early as 2024. It will require banks and asset managers not to finance new fossil fuel projects.

This proved too much for Standard Chartered, which wants to continue this business in developing markets. A spokesperson for the bank confirmed it had left the validation process and said SBTi's proposed standard failed to consider adequately "the transition (away from fossil fuels) of our clients and markets".

The spokesperson added that Standard Chartered was seeking alternative third-party validation of its climate targets and that it was setting science-based targets through the NZBA.

An HSBC spokesperson said the bank was setting its emissions targets in line with NZBA guidance. A spokesperson for Societe Generale said the French bank was also committed to setting its emissions targets in line with NZBA's methodology.

A spokesperson for ABN Amro said the Dutch lender remained an NZBA member after leaving SBTi.

An SBTi spokesperson told Reuters that, following feedback, SBTi changed some of its requirements. It will allow banks to continue to finance some fossil fuel projects as long as they pertain to emissions targets that have to be met near-term. It will still require them to cease the financing of fossil fuel projects that would weigh on their longer-term emissions targets.

"We cannot limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and mitigate the risks of climate breakdown without reducing our dependence on fossil fuels," SBTi said in a statement.

To be sure, most major European banks that signed up to SBTi remain members. Credit Agricole CAGR.PA, ING INGA.AS, BBVA BBVA.MC and Swedbank SWEDa.ST told Reuters they remained committed to SBTi validating their emissions targets.

SBTi has already approved some NatWest, Commerzbank and Raiffeisen targets. BNP Paribas BNPP.PA did not respond to requests for comment about its SBTi status.

No major U.S. bank has joined SBTi, opting instead for NZBA's easier-to-meet standards.

CRACKS SPREADING

In a sign that cracks between SBTi and financial firms could spread, a spokesperson for Allianz AVLG.DE said the German insurance giant had also quit, without providing a reason.

The spokesperson said Allianz was committed to the target-setting methodology of the Net-Zero Asset Owners Alliance, another U.N. backed climate coalition it is a member of. This year, Allianz quit the Net-Zero Insurance Alliance amid concerns that the climate coalition was at risk of violating antitrust law.

It is not the first time that banks have sought to lower the bar on the emissions they help finance. Reuters reported in July that lenders working to develop global standards on accounting for greenhouse gases in bond or stock sale underwriting voted to exclude most of these emissions from their own carbon footprint.

Pietro Rocco, head of green finance at the Carbon Trust, which advises firms on decarbonising, said he was concerned that leaving SBTi would lead to less ambitious emissions targets.

"They hold you to a higher standard than NZBA. SBTi shows you haven't gone off on your own, it's been marked," Rocco said.



Reporting by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes in London
Editing by Simon Jessop and Josie Kao

</body></html>

Disclaimer: De entiteiten van de XM Group bieden diensten en toegang tot ons online handelsplatform op basis van uitsluitend-uitvoering, waardoor een persoon de beschikbare content op of via de website kan bekijken en/of gebruiken, zonder dat dit is bedoeld voor wijziging of uitbreiding. Dergelijk(e) toegang en gebruik vallen onder: (i) de algemene voorwaarden; (ii) risicowaarschuwingen; en de (iii) volledige disclaimer. Dergelijke content wordt daarom alleen aangeboden als algemene informatie. Wees u er daarnaast vooral van bewust dat de inhoud op ons online handelsplatform geen verzoek of aanbieding omvat om transacties op de financiële markten uit te voeren. Het beleggen op welke financiële markt dan ook vormt een aanzienlijk risico voor uw vermogen.

Alle materialen die op ons online handelsplatform worden gepubliceerd zijn bedoeld voor educatieve/informatieve doeleinden en omvatten geen – en moeten niet worden beschouwd als het bevatten van – financieel, vermogensbelastings- of handelsadvies en aanbevelingen, of een overzicht van onze handelsprijzen, of een aanbod of aanvraag van een transactie in financiële instrumenten of ongevraagde financiële promoties voor u.

Alle content van derden, alsmede content die is voorbereid door XM, zoals opinies, nieuws, onderzoeken, analyses, prijzen en andere informatie of koppelingen naar externe websites op deze website worden aangeboden op een 'zoals-ze-zijn'-basis, als algemene marktcommentaren, en vormen geen beleggingsadvies. Voor zover dat content wordt beschouwd als beleggingsonderzoek, moet u zich ervan bewust zijn en accepteren dat de content niet bedoeld was en niet is voorbereid in overeenstemming met de wettelijke vereisten die zijn opgesteld om de onafhankelijkheid van beleggingsonderzoek te bevorderen en als zodanig onder de geldende wetgeving en richtlijnen moet worden beschouwd als marketingcommunicatie. Zorg ervoor dat u onze Mededeling over niet-onafhankelijk beleggingsonderzoek en risicowaarschuwing in verband met de voorgaande informatie doorneemt en begrijpt; die kunt u hier lezen.

Risicowaarschuwing: Uw vermogen loopt risico. Hefboomproducten zijn mogelijk niet voor iedereen geschikt. Lees onze informatie over risico's.