Tesla's plan for affordable cars takes page from Detroit rivals
By Abhirup Roy, Norihiko Shirouzu and Hyunjoo Jin
SAN FRANCISCO/AUSTIN, Texas, April 26 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's new plan to use current product lines as the basis for new affordable vehicles — rather than springing for all-new models — follows the playbook of Tesla's old-school Detroit rivals, as some Tesla investors and analysts see it.
The shift toward incremental improvement, mirroring a common strategy of Ford F.N and General Motors GM.N, suggests the future of car-making that Musk has promised to disrupt may still look a lot like the past.
Musk's new strategy followed an exclusive Reuters report that Tesla had shelved plans to release a long-awaited, new model expected to cost $25,000 in late 2025. Investors had expected the affordable car, often called the Model 2, to drive the company's growth into a mass-market automaker.
Instead, Tesla said this week, it will use a current platform and production lines to produce what it called "more affordable" models by early next year. It did not provide details or pricing.
The announcement sparked a double-digit stock rise and drew widespread praise from investors. Some analysts expect Tesla to offer basic versions of the Model 3 and Y, which currently start at about $39,000 and $43,000.
"It is a traditional automaker strategy," said Sandeep Rao, a senior researcher at Leverage Shares, an investment management company with assets of about $500 million, including in Tesla and other EV makers.
"You can go and buy a Volkswagen Golf Highline, which is a basic version, or you can go buy a GT, which is a pricier version and also 25% more expensive."
Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
"That's probably going to be one of the most popular cars, if they do get it launched," said King Lip, chief strategist at BakerAvenue Wealth Management, which has a small position in Tesla.
Tesla said the change would allow the company to launch low-cost vehicles swiftly but would result in smaller cost reduction than had been expected and modest volume growth.
'STRIPPED-DOWN VERSIONS' IN A YEAR?
Some analysts expect the new models to look familiar.
"We see it as more likely that Tesla will attempt to launch stripped-down versions of the Model 3 and Y as lower-cost models, however we are unclear on how much cost Tesla can realistically take out," Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi said in a report.
In January, Tesla said it was approaching "the natural limit of cost down of our existing vehicle lineup."
Musk's target of a new car in a year was seen as optimistic at best by many investors and analysts, given that Musk has often failed to meet his own timing predictions: The new Cybertruck arrived four years after Musk unveiled it in 2019, and Tesla is still having trouble ramping up production.
"By traditional, legacy car guy standards that Cybertruck ramp is a crawl," said James Womack, a former research director at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He co-authored a 1990 book on Toyota's lean production philosophy and methods and said it was long overdue for Tesla to act like a legacy car maker when it came to launching new vehicles on time.
"Musk can tread out on the ragged edge and lean over the cliff as tech visionary," he said. But he and others raised concerns about "execution risk" — whether Tesla could do what Musk plans, on time. "They just need to avoid too much Musk in execution" of the production plan, Womack said.
While Tesla's shift "tempers or slows down manufacturing innovation," the change will enable Tesla to respond faster to the threat from Chinese automakers, said K. Venkatesh Prasad, a former Ford engineer, who is now chief innovation officer at the Center for Automotive Research.
"There is an urgency. If you didn't have speed, then you lose the game," Prasad said.
The change in strategy has some investors rethinking Tesla's industry-leading valuation. Don Nesbitt, senior portfolio manager at ZCM, said that while there is the possibility of autonomous driving, eventually, right now they need to shift to making lower-cost models.
Tesla used to be seen as a tech stock; "Now you're really talking about an automaker and that's it," he said.
Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin, Abhirup Roy and Norihiko Shirouzu; additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf and Suzanne McGee; Editing by Peter Henderson, Jonathan Oatis and Lisa Shumaker
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
