Woodside should walk away from Santos deal, large shareholder says
By Lewis Jackson
SYDNEY, Feb 1 (Reuters) -Woodside WDS.AX should walk away from its proposed $57 billion merger with Santos STO.AX rather than pay a premium for its smaller rival, a large shareholder said on Thursday, a sign of the deep divide between both sides over fair value.
Fund manager Allan Gray Australia owns a roughly A$700 million ($460 million) stake in Australian oil and gas producer Woodside, according to CIO Simon Mawhinney.
In a letter sent to Woodside management on Thursday, the fund manager said paying a premium for Santos would destroy value at Woodside and is not in the best interests of its shareholders, Mawhinney told Reuters in an interview.
Mawhinney did not provide Reuters with a copy of the letter.
"We like both companies but its about relative value. Woodside shareholders would be diluted even at today's share price," he said.
"If they paid a premium it would be even a greater dilution. We think they should walk away, we don't think this transaction should happen."
Thursday's letter to Woodside's management and board follows several emails outlining Allan Gray's concerns, Mawhinney said. The fund manager also owns a roughly A$300 million stake in Santos.
Woodside declined to comment on whether it had received the letter.
Woodside and Santos in December confirmed speculation they were in preliminary discussions to create a joint entity that would have oil and natural gas assets stretching from Australia to Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, Papua New Guinea, Senegal and Trinidad and Tobago.
While both parties said last month talks remain at an early stage, price has emerged as a major concern for Santos shareholders, who have repeatedly called for a significant premium.
Their case received a boost last month when a court dismissed a key legal hurdle to Santos' $4.3 billion Barossa natural gas project.
However, days later Woodside CEO Meg O'Neill appeared to hose down expectations of a large premium, saying the precedent set by recent oil and gas deals in the U.S. and Europe was for a "low to nil premium".
Allan Gray's own calculations suggested a discount to Santos' close on Wednesday of A$7.85 would be appropriate, Mawhinney said.
The Woodside-Santos tie-up comes amid a wave of consolidation in the global energy sector at relatively skinny premiums.
Exxon Mobil's $59.5 billion stock deal for Pioneer Natural Resources and Chevron's $53 billion acquisition of Hess were at premiums of 18% and 5%, respectively.
($1 = 1.5235 Australian dollars)
Reporting by Lewis Jackson; Editing by Praveen Menon and Christian Schmollinger
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
