Roomster must face lawsuit by U.S. FTC, six states over fake reviews
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, Feb 1 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Wednesday ordered the roommate matching service Roomster to face a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission and six states claiming it used fake listings and reviews to take millions of dollars from people struggling to find affordable housing.
Without ruling on the merits, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon in Manhattan said the lawsuit "strongly suggests" that Roomster and its co-founders knew their platform contained tens of thousands of fake positive reviews, and misled prospective renters into thinking its listings were real.
She also said the plaintiffs demonstrated "a realistic likelihood of recurrence given defendants' pattern of willful and deliberate behavior over the course of several years."
New York, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois and Massachusetts joined the FTC case last August against Roomster and co-founders John Shriber and Roman Zaks, respectively its chief executive officer and chief technology officer.
The complaint said many victims were lower-income renters and students, with many lured into paying even more money to fraudsters who flooded New York-based Roomster's platform with fake listings.
Lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In seeking a dismissal, the defendants said they had ceased the alleged improper conduct in 2018, that the FTC lacked power to sue, and the user reviews were not deceptive under state laws.
They also said the federal Communication Decency Act shielded them from liability because Roomster, like Facebook and YouTube, did not need to verify the accuracy of user content.
McMahon, however, said that law "does not immunize defendants from liability for their own unlawful conduct."
The lawsuit sought civil penalties and an injunction against violations of federal and state unfair trade laws.
In October, the FTC sought public comment on whether to adopt a rule to combat deceptive or unfair endorsement practices, such as by using fake reviews, suppressing negative reviews and paying for positive reviews.
The case is FTC et al v Roomster Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-07389.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
